At the New Attitude blog, Doug Hayes asks,
What is the mission of the church? Are God’s people called to evangelize the lost by preaching the gospel and calling people to repentance? Or are we to spend our time and resources ministering to the needs of the poor? Are these two activities even meant to be distinguished from one another? Is the gospel preached when we act in harmony with the mercy and justice of God? Are the needs of the poor best met when we address spiritual need, rather than putting food in the bellies of lost souls?
These questions deal directly with the recent conversation on missional and what Ryken was called for in “cultural transformation.” Hayes answers the questions,
So which one is it? Is the church to be concerned with evangelism or care for the poor?
Yes.
It is the job of the church to preach the gospel, and it is the job of the church to care for the poor. Too often, these two high callings are treated as an “either-or” proposition, but Scripture calls God’s people to a “both-and” embracing of both. We are called very clearly to preach the gospel, and we are called very clearly to serve the poor. One should not be done to the exclusion of the other, nor does our obedience to one fulfill our mandate for the other.
Watch out Mr. Hayes! Fundamentalists will start accusing you of preaching a social gospel! But alas, Paul would agree as well as contemporaries like Carl F.H. Henry and Tim Keller. Kudos for an article well written. Here’s a couple more excerpts:
If we consider it our calling only to preach the gospel, we may address people’s spiritual needs very well, but we miss an opportunity to substantiate the truth of our words through our actions. We miss an opportunity to glorify God by displaying another beautiful aspect of his mercy. I believe Christians need to become more comfortable with the fact that God is glorified through our merciful actions, even if they never lead to the salvation of the person we’re ministering to. If you faithfully care for a suffering friend or family member over a period of years, yet that person dies without Christ, you have not wasted your time. You have greatly glorified God through perseverant, merciful action! This may seem like a startling statement at first, but Scripture does not command us to serve the poor merely as a pretense for evangelism. We care for the poor as a means of reflecting the merciful character of God. As we faithfully do that, his name is glorified. The eternal results are his domain.
We must never confuse these two great mandates the Lord has placed upon us as his people. We can’t accomplish one by doing the other, and the absence or minimization of either represents a failure to carry out the mission God has called us to. Yet even as we distinguish between evangelism and mercy ministry, we recognize that the gospel is the common thread that binds the two together. We desire to take advantage of every opportunity to proclaim the gospel with our lips even as we are demonstrating its authenticity with our deeds. The gospel is central to everything we do. It is the hub from which and to which all ministry flows. Our hope is always to proclaim the gospel, even when our primary ministry activity is oriented toward physical mercy rather than evangelism.
He may have stated this more clearly in the whole article, but just in case, this should be said:
“If you faithfully care for a suffering friend or family member over a period of years, yet that person dies without Christ, you have not wasted your time.”
Yet if you’ve cared for them and never shared the gospel with them, you never really cared for them.
Who knows what fundies will do, but I think most evangelicals today realize that it’s not an either-or thing. Unfortunately a lot of liberals have made that discovery.