For almost a week, I could not access Baptist Press online. I am still trying to decide if it is better having BP online or offline.
Yesterday, Baptist Press ran one of the best articles I have read in a long time entitled “The Wall Is the Castle” written by Doug Baker. What was surprising to me was that they actually allowed some self-critique of the SBC to be printed in their “First Person” or opinion column.
Or so I thought.
In less than 24 hours, Baptist Press took Baker’s article off their website, though it just so happened that Ergun Caner’s opinion piece remained online. Now what do you think was the cause or rationale for removing Baker’s article? One would imagine that any journalistic ethics would require sufficient warrant for the removal of an article that was published–namely that of either plagiarism or factual inaccuracies that result in a retraction or correction by the author. However, neither have been proven true in Baker’s case. Indeed, not even The New York Times or The Washington Post would have pulled such a tactical breach of journalistic integrity.
So what then? Are we to conclude, as others have, that Baker’s article was not politically correct enough to last twenty four hours before calls came in to take it down? Are we to agree that Baptist Press has become nothing short of the public relations arm of the controlling elites of the Southern Baptist Convention? Or is it that a devil has gotten into the Baptist Press and caused all this? Or all of the above?
Now, on the same day, Ergun Caner says the following statement:
For the past few years, I have become increasingly frustrated as I have watched young preachers turn on our elders. I mourn when I hear of another young minister demand a “seat at the table,” as if leadership was our birthright. I shudder when I read blogs of men who have never grown a single church, or accomplished anything to deserve to have an opinion, criticize those who have toiled the fields of souls, sweat through all-night prayer meetings, and bled on the battlefields of spiritual warfare.
Jeremy Green and others in the short-lived “Joshua Convergence” were saying the same thing last summer. Who are they talking about? Can this charge be substantiated? Perhaps the editors of Baptist Press pulled the wrong editorial piece. Rather than looking for a seat at the table, most young ministers I know are looking for the exit sign, and I can substantiate that. But I suppose Caner was saying things that resonated with the particular audience which approves of such sentiment; therefore, it stands. Isn’t that what has become of the political arena of the SBC?
When a people come to the place that they cannot handle self-critique, they cannot handle the truth. The war-torn SBC has raised a generation of ministers who are weary of political agendas and always looking for a new fight. Nathan Finn rightly asserted that we cannot replace one bureaucracy with another bureaucracy, and if we don’t realize that the Conservative Resurgence is over and our churches are desperately in need of renewal, the next generation will look back at the ruins and wonder what became of the Southern Baptist Convention. Inerrancy isn’t enough (if I may cite one of Baker’s articles that still exists on Baptist Press), and we cannot keep living like it is 1988 lest we find ourselves looking for skunks rather than devils.
In his article Baker said,
“Some predict the inevitable loss of the denomination, and if history is a guide, they are correct. The effects of the Fall seldom enable people, even Christians, to work together for very long. Pride rears its ugly head and personal agendas quickly choke the life out of good efforts and sanctified innovation.”
He concludes with a word of optimism, explaining that we are at a turning point, and encouraging Southern Baptists to write the history that unifies us under the gospel of Jesus Christ not buries us under the ash heap of political agendas. When such an article as Baker’s cannot be allowed to be read on Baptist Press, one has to wonder whether we are erecting a new wall that finds Jesus outside the camp.
Maybe we’re jumping the gun here. How long has Baker’s article been down? Has it just been moved off the front page? The fact is that the article was posted and now it is down. The reason is unclear for the time being.
Adam,
The article was removed. It was taken down by the editor of Baptist Press. Baker’s “First Person” article was posted the same time as Ergun Caner’s. The fact is that the article was taken down for other reasons than aforementioned in my post (plagiarism or inaccurate statements).
I appreicate your concern, but had I believed I was jumping the gun in what I have said, I would not have posted it.
I am very discouraged by the lack of integrity and balance in Baptist journalism. When reporting on others (including CBF) they seek to be journalists, but in SBC-related issues they are only newsletter supporters.
This deplorable situation recently became evident through an ABC News investigation of sexual molestation in the SBC. Although ABC was slanted and perhaps unfair in their treatment, why did I have to hear about this problem through the secular media? Isn’t judgment to begin in the house of God? Doesn’t our inability to hold ourselves in account violate the principle underlying 1Cor. 6.4-6?
Scripture tells us: “Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all, so that the rest also may be fearful of sinning.” (1 Timothy 5:20 NASB). Are we no better than the Romans who turn a blind eye to problems and sin in their midst? Do we seriously think that we will escape judgment for constantly picking at the specks in others’ eyes while we ignore and silence critique on the beams in our own?
I very nearly wrote a Resolution for San Antonio addressing these issues, but decided to wait one more year.
Tim,
Very good post. I am past tired of the straw man arguments employed by Ergun (a la White & Ascol).
I don’t know whether this was by design, but check out outsidethecamp.org. SCARY folks. Talk about leaving Christ outside the camp…
Per request and due to the nature of our conversation, I have taken the comments made by Mark Rogers and myself offline.
Arron,
Yes, I have heard of this group of extreme hyper-Calvinists. In fact, I first found out about them through my blog. For details see the comments of this post (Andrew C. Bain is from Outside the Camp):
http://timmybrister.com/2005/10/20/jack-graham-comes-to-southern-seminary-part-two/
Wait a minute, they’re from Vermont. Why is it I’ve never heard of them? Probably because they’re another single-family ultrafundamentalist church. The Green Mountain Baptist Association has 35 churches in it representing the SBC in the state of Vermont, and only four of them are substantially more than single family churches. Here’s an example, this church is in South Burlington, VT, in Vermont’s most populated county: http://www.vermontbaptist.org/churches/newcovenant.shtml
Here is an example of a healthy vermont church in the same county (other than my home church), notice how even sunday school attendance far outstrips membership:
http://www.vermontbaptist.org/churches/daybreak.shtml
Guillaume,
I am not sure I understand the rationale of your comment. Who are “they”? And to whom are you directing the comment?